Rope Rigging Academy
Rope Rigging Academy
  • Видео 7
  • Просмотров 579 835
Pulley systems with remote load
This is the third video in the pulley series. In this video we discuss and demonstrate simple pulley system with remote load. We identify and discuss the use of haul cams / grabs and brake cams / grabs.
Просмотров: 153 045

Видео

Simple pulley systems
Просмотров 116 тыс.9 лет назад
This is the second video in the pulley series. In this video we identify and discuss simple pulley system. We also show how to determine the mechanical advantage of simple pulley systems.
Introduction to pulleys
Просмотров 12 тыс.9 лет назад
Introduction to pulleys and pulley systems - Part 1 This video is aimed at beginner level.
Rigging anchors for balanced load
Просмотров 184 тыс.10 лет назад
This video has been extracted from one of our rope rigging training programs (Australia). In the video we present two rules of thumb for achieving balanced load onto two anchor points. We also uncover some of the misconceptions relating to balancing load between two anchors points. Best watched on a monitor but still good with a smart phone.
Collapse rate Pt 2 Simple and compound MA
Просмотров 61 тыс.10 лет назад
This is the second video on collapse rate. It describes how to determine the collapse rate for simple and compound pulley systems.
Collapse rate Pt 1 Application
Просмотров 12 тыс.10 лет назад
This video shows the application of collapse rate in a comparison between 3 different pulley configurations.
Proposed fall protection method for rope access
Просмотров 42 тыс.10 лет назад
This video has been prepared to illustrate the proposed fall protection method for rope access operations described in Highpoint Access & Rescue's June 2013 proposal.

Комментарии

  • @ccaaproduction105
    @ccaaproduction105 4 года назад

    Good job, Thank you for your information.

  • @markpinther9296
    @markpinther9296 6 лет назад

    Excellent job.

  • @user-uu9iw8ls2y
    @user-uu9iw8ls2y 6 лет назад

    Thank you

  • @TheMadMagician87
    @TheMadMagician87 6 лет назад

    Great info and demonstration, thanks.

  • @natoyilively9379
    @natoyilively9379 6 лет назад

    Thank your for this simple explanation of rope angles :)

  • @mikeoreilly7122
    @mikeoreilly7122 6 лет назад

    Straight talk advice. Finally good communication.

  • @johnwvwa9547
    @johnwvwa9547 6 лет назад

    Great video, great teacher

  • @ukidding
    @ukidding 6 лет назад

    good one

  • @alexescalada13
    @alexescalada13 6 лет назад

    Excellent video! A great tool that explains.

  • @jeffm9227
    @jeffm9227 7 лет назад

    Concise, helpful.

  • @Random13
    @Random13 7 лет назад

    Explained perfectly, thanks!

  • @CanyonsCrags
    @CanyonsCrags 7 лет назад

    Excellent video! I've been sharing it regularly with people struggling to understand the concepts. Kudos.

  • @koggism
    @koggism 7 лет назад

    Great work.

  • @msherpa9594
    @msherpa9594 7 лет назад

    Thank you for another excellent presentation. I propose calling the "I", "IFFY" instead of IDEAL in the I, Y, T method !

  • @tonyowen1946
    @tonyowen1946 7 лет назад

    I can see the advantages of the different systems but assuming the load to lift is 100 KG what is the load on the anchor point for each of the systems?

  • @robertbarr9962
    @robertbarr9962 7 лет назад

    Excellent tuition. Simple,direct,all the relevant information and just the relevant information - the mark of those who have mastered their subject. Tutor delivery of the same standard too. You've set the bar very high for those who wish to follow. Well done and thank you.

  • @chrisk8208
    @chrisk8208 7 лет назад

    Thanks, I wasn't aware of the Prusik minding sheave arrangement. Excellent information. Cheers.

  • @manuelantoniomonteroparra5950
    @manuelantoniomonteroparra5950 7 лет назад

    180 power

  • @adventureswithfrodo2721
    @adventureswithfrodo2721 7 лет назад

    protractor.

  • @subasurf
    @subasurf 7 лет назад

    great job mate

  • @TomSmith-io9uk
    @TomSmith-io9uk 7 лет назад

    Good Teaching.

  • @ElemenTerreServiceBucheronnage
    @ElemenTerreServiceBucheronnage 7 лет назад

    Hello, Very hard to handerstand and to reproduc, but it's working (one goes x2 speed than an others). Thanks i'll watch the other time to assimilate! Sorry for the orthograph.

  • @ElemenTerreServiceBucheronnage
    @ElemenTerreServiceBucheronnage 7 лет назад

    Hello Good système for à personne or a little charge, but the descendeur is not for the eavy load! The second système is good for the eavy load. Thank you for the vidéo!

  • @ChathamJackTar
    @ChathamJackTar 7 лет назад

    Excellent. Thank you.

  • @ChathamJackTar
    @ChathamJackTar 7 лет назад

    Excellent.

  • @ChathamJackTar
    @ChathamJackTar 7 лет назад

    Excellent.

  • @ChathamJackTar
    @ChathamJackTar 7 лет назад

    Excellent.

  • @chrisk8208
    @chrisk8208 7 лет назад

    At 4:50 you mention an MPD. For those (like me) who didn't know what that was, it's a multi purpose device as shown here. www.cmcrescue.com/equipment/rope-rescue-team-kit-mpd-rigging/

  • @Cockney68
    @Cockney68 8 лет назад

    great vid thanks

  • @glyn7853
    @glyn7853 8 лет назад

    Great instructional video, however I'm still not too sure about why using anchors less than 30 degrees is dangerous. I see what you're saying that when the load is not balanced you will have uneven stresses on the anchors, but that is the same for anchors between 30 and 90 degrees, as you have demonstrated at 90 degrees. Why do the 'below 30 angles' get relegated to the red dashed line club?

    • @andrewcarter2229
      @andrewcarter2229 7 лет назад

      because, as he says, you can massively alter the loads with only a tiny shift in the bisecting angle. this makes it less consistent, and give rise to the sudden risk of spiking up to a sudden huge load on one anchor. the larger angle does render the anchors subject to such sudden fluctuations. he's not saying uneven stresses don't occur in the 30-90 range when the bisecting angle is not central; he's saying to be wary of tighter angles because uneven stresses have bigger consequences with less change.

  • @fyanezc
    @fyanezc 8 лет назад

    Thanks for this video, it has really helped me understand further the pulley system!

  • @78wesley
    @78wesley 8 лет назад

    do U have a website we can visit ? are u located in NSW ??

  • @ljljlkj
    @ljljlkj 8 лет назад

    angles matter

  • @misterbonzoid
    @misterbonzoid 8 лет назад

    The 2 degree increase from 150 to 152 degrees in angle doesn't give a 25% increase in loading (7m40s), but a 25kg increase. That's about 12% of 190kg.

  • @joerodriguez8272
    @joerodriguez8272 8 лет назад

    Just rent a crane.

  • @MelbourneClimbingSchool
    @MelbourneClimbingSchool 8 лет назад

    wow! excellent video, explains things very nicely!

  • @davelimson854
    @davelimson854 8 лет назад

    Great very interesting video

  • @youssefelazzab449
    @youssefelazzab449 8 лет назад

    thank you

  • @mikeskiuk
    @mikeskiuk 9 лет назад

    Very clear and interesting demonstation. I'd love to see a video showing the loads generated by the american death triangle.

  • @sergeantcrow
    @sergeantcrow 9 лет назад

    Thank you Rob... An essential tutorial for all climbing sports too..

  • @FedorLejepekov
    @FedorLejepekov 9 лет назад

    Hello, I have a question and suggestion to part 3: As You mention in previous part, MA of the system is equal to number of strings attached to the load. There is a competing opinion that MA of the system is equal to number of pulleys attached to the load multiplyed 2, so it can only be even number: 2:1,4:1, etc.., so odd MA systems are not exists and last odd string attached to load directly is have only load re-directional role. Can You please make experiment of simple pulley system with 5:1 and compare it with equal 5:1, but attach last 5th string not to the load, but, let's say, to the ground, or some another static point and compare effort required to hold load hanging under the ground. I have made attempt to do such experiment, but i haven't digital measurement equipment and because of friction and small weights i've used I was unable to achieve solid result proving one or another opinion.

  • @heli400
    @heli400 9 лет назад

    excellent video! I picked up a few gems of information for my rock climbing anchors setup. (strive for minimum 30 degrees now!)

  • @tobo3035
    @tobo3035 9 лет назад

    learnt more new things about Y hangs, and had my pre-existing perceptions challenged more, than I have for years. Thank you.

  • @tuulipage
    @tuulipage 9 лет назад

    Great video, thanks for sharing. We posted on our Search & Rescue team page. (facebook.com/WildernessRescueTeam?ref=bookmarks)

  • @johnkelly5166
    @johnkelly5166 9 лет назад

    This is great!!

  • @RopeRiggingAcademy
    @RopeRiggingAcademy 9 лет назад

    Hi Mark, That’s a good question. When we haul in the direction of travel, the rope is generally doing a 180 degree turn around the pulley. The angle between the ropes (often referred to as the internal angle) will be zero degrees. In this situation we get maximum mechanical advantage. When we haul off line, or not in the direction of travel, the internal angle increases and we get a corresponding reduction in mechanical advantage. We are talking ideal mechanical advantage (IMA) here so we are disregarding friction through pulleys, additional mass of equipment and a few other effects. If we consider a simple 2:1 pulley system: 0 degrees Internal angle gives 2 : 1 Ideal Mechanical Advantage (IMA) 30 degrees gives 1.9 : 1 IMA 60 degrees gives 1.7 : 1 IMA 90 degrees gives 1.4 : 1 IMA 120 degrees gives 1 : 1 IMA So from this, the internal angle can run out to 30 degrees without too much loss but when the internal angle reaches 120 degrees, there is no mechanical advantage. Thanks for the question. I hope this information answers it.

  • @rastusodanga
    @rastusodanga 9 лет назад

    Rob: at 2:44 to approximately 3:10 you talk about pulling in the direction the load is travelling and losing mechanical advantage as the angle increases. Is there any information you know of that tells us how much MA we are losing at differing angles? I'm just trying to figure when it would be appropriate or necessary to use a change of direction pulley. Thanks in advance.

  • @ZeroContentSF
    @ZeroContentSF 9 лет назад

    by far the best video i've seen to explain vector forces. Thank you.

  • @VLcommodore1987
    @VLcommodore1987 9 лет назад

    Fantastic demonstration thanks mate!

  • @Beasthornen
    @Beasthornen 9 лет назад

    Part 3?